Mid-40s HR director at a corner-office desk, late afternoon golden hour, confronting a number on her laptop
For HR & benefits leaders

What is caregiving costing your business?

Three quick inputs. Real citations. An honest estimate of the productivity, turnover, and role-shrinkage cost of caregiver employees in your organization — and the slice Averyn is actually built to address.

No signup to see the estimate. Optional email to receive the methodology one-pager.

Three questions about your organization

Full org headcount (or the segment of the org you're scoping).
500
Used to derive hourly value and loaded cost. Don't worry about exact — this is a back-of-the-envelope tool.
$85,000
Industry sets the caregiver-prevalence rate and the typical replacement-cost factor used in the turnover calculation.

Estimated annual cost to your business $0

Based on 0 estimated caregiver employees (roughly 1 in 5 of your workforce, varying by industry).

Productivity drag $0 ~10% reduced effective output during caregiving periods.
Absenteeism $0 ~6 days/year attributable to caregiving per affected employee.
Caregiver-driven turnover $0 Incremental turnover above baseline × replacement cost (industry-adjusted).
Role-shrinkage $0 Declined promotions, reduced hours — foregone capacity from your bench.
What Averyn actually addresses

Roughly one-third of caregiver hours are administrative coordination — phone calls, portals, scheduling, paperwork, family updates — per AARP/NAC 2025 categorization. That is the layer Averyn addresses. Hands-on care, clinical decisions, and the emotional labor of being there — those stay with the family.

Of your estimated total cost, the slice Averyn is built to relieve is roughly $0 per year (~21% of total — admin share × our conservative relief fraction). We don't claim more than that. We don't need to.

Where this is most impactful: your executives, partners, and top professionals.

The math gets sharpest at the top of your org chart. Replacing a partner, director, or top performer typically costs 200%+ of annual salary — and HCEs are statistically the most likely to silently absorb caregiving without telling anyone (SHRM Working Caregivers), most likely to decline promotions or reduce hours rather than ask for help, and most likely to retire early.

Because HCEs can comfortably afford the personal portion, offering Averyn as a voluntary benefit at preferred annual-commitment pricing (no employer cost) still captures the retention upside. You don't have to co-fund to see the ROI — you just have to make the resource visible.

See "Three ways to offer Averyn" → · Read the full HCE / voluntary-benefit analysis →

And here's the part that compounds the cost: even when employees are putting in the time, things still slip.

  • The referral that quietly expired in a fax queue — now a new specialist intake from scratch.
  • The aide who walked in cold and quit a week later because no one briefed them.
  • The medication change two specialists made without telling each other — caught after a stay.
  • The home-health visit window that closed unused.

Your employees are already paying the cost. The org is already absorbing it. Balls still drop.

What changes: the employee stays focused during the workday. The Sunday-night dread fades. HR sees retention math work in the segment that's hardest to replace. Aggregate utilization reports tell you whether the benefit is reaching the people you most want to retain — without exposing any individual case detail.

For context — what Averyn costs per family per month

Your employees pay these rates directly under a voluntary benefit; you and the family share them under a co-funded pilot.

Essentials $59/mo Stable situation
Expanded $249/mo Active coordination
Dedicated $799/mo Weekly cadence
Anchor $2,999/mo Daily fragile

Three ways to offer Averyn:

Co-funded pilot (measurable in 90 days) · Voluntary benefit (zero cost, sharpest for HCEs) · LSA-eligible (extends your existing menu). See which path fits →

Want the methodology one-pager?

We'll send the full source list, every coefficient, and the math behind these numbers — plus a Full Analysis tailored to your organization if you want one.

We'll send a few follow-up resources over the next month. Unsubscribe anytime.

Methodology & sources

Every coefficient is cited. Numbers are intentionally conservative; the goal is a defensible estimate, not a sales pitch.

Caregiver prevalence in your workforce

National average is approximately 21% of working adults — AARP/NAC, 2025. We adjust slightly by industry (e.g. higher in healthcare, lower in retail/hospitality) using SHRM & Gallup workforce composition data.

Productivity drag

10% reduction in effective output during caregiving periods — midpoint of the 8–12% range reported in SHRM Working Caregivers (2024) and HBS / Fuller & Raman (The Caring Company, 2019). Applied to loaded salary (salary × 1.25 for benefits and payroll taxes).

Absenteeism

6 absence days/year attributable to caregiving — AARP/NAC 2025 + Gallup workplace caregiving. Valued at the daily loaded rate.

Caregiver-driven turnover

Caregiver employees turn over at approximately 13% annually vs ~10% baseline. The incremental ~3 percentage points is multiplied by your industry's typical replacement-cost factor (0.40–1.50× annual salary; HCE roles run 2×+ — see HCE callout above). Source: SHRM turnover benchmarks.

Role-shrinkage

16% of working caregivers decline a promotion; 27% reduce hours — AARP/NAC 2025. We blend these into a "foregone capacity" estimate at ~10% of loaded salary per shrinkage event — deliberately conservative; published estimates run higher.

Averyn-addressable slice

Admin/coordination is ~32% of caregiver time per AARP/NAC IADL + care-coordination categorization. Of that admin layer, Averyn realistically relieves ~65% (handles the work without eliminating the underlying need for occasional oversight). Net: ~21% of total caregiver burden — the figure shown above.

What this estimate does NOT include

  • Presenteeism in non-caregiver employees
  • Healthcare cost spillover (caregiver-as-patient effect — documented by Personify Health but excluded for conservatism)
  • FMLA administrative time and downstream backfill cost
  • Recruiting cost amortization on caregiver-driven attrition
  • Brand / culture impact of being known as a caregiver-friendly employer